<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><!-- generator="b2evolution/3.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Priveon Labs Security Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.priveonlabs.com/sec_blog.php</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://blog.priveonlabs.com/sec_blog.php?tempskin=_rss2" />
		<description>Priveon Labs Security Blog</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://b2evolution.net/?v=3.3.1"/>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
				<item>
			<title>AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client version 3.1 - Untrusted VPN Server blocked</title>
			<link>http://blog.priveonlabs.com/sec_blog.php?title=anyconnect-secure-mobility-client-version-3-1-untrusted-vpn-server-blocked&amp;more=1&amp;c=1&amp;tb=1&amp;pb=1</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 13:34:50 +0000</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Brandon Culler</dc:creator>
			<category domain="alt">Cisco ASA</category>
<category domain="main">Cisco AnyConnect</category>			<guid isPermaLink="false">261@http://blog.priveonlabs.com/</guid>
						<description>With the increase of targeted attacks against mobile users on untrusted networks, Cisco has improved the security protections in the AnyConnect Secure Mobility client version 3.1 to help prevent serious security breaches. The default client behavior has&amp;hellip;&lt;div class=&quot;item_footer&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.priveonlabs.com/sec_blog.php?title=anyconnect-secure-mobility-client-version-3-1-untrusted-vpn-server-blocked&amp;amp;more=1&amp;amp;c=1&amp;amp;tb=1&amp;amp;pb=1&quot;&gt;Original post&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[With the increase of targeted attacks against mobile users on untrusted networks, Cisco has improved the security protections in the AnyConnect Secure Mobility client version 3.1 to help prevent serious security breaches. The default client behavior has&hellip;<div class="item_footer"><p><small><a href="http://blog.priveonlabs.com/sec_blog.php?title=anyconnect-secure-mobility-client-version-3-1-untrusted-vpn-server-blocked&amp;more=1&amp;c=1&amp;tb=1&amp;pb=1">Original post</a>.</small></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
								<comments>http://blog.priveonlabs.com/sec_blog.php?title=anyconnect-secure-mobility-client-version-3-1-untrusted-vpn-server-blocked&amp;more=1&amp;c=1&amp;tb=1&amp;pb=1#comments</comments>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.priveonlabs.com/sec_blog.php?tempskin=_rss2&#38;disp=comments&#38;p=261</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>Cisco ACS v5 should be able to query only desired Domain Controllers &#8211; Active Directory/DNS Workaround</title>
			<link>http://blog.priveonlabs.com/sec_blog.php?title=acs-v5-should-be-able-to-query-only-desired-domain-controllers-active-directory-dns-workaround&amp;more=1&amp;c=1&amp;tb=1&amp;pb=1</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 20:38:21 +0000</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Brandon Culler</dc:creator>
			<category domain="alt">Cisco Security</category>
<category domain="main">Cisco ACS</category>			<guid isPermaLink="false">260@http://blog.priveonlabs.com/</guid>
						<description>Background:Currently in ACS 5.x, ACS queries DNS in order to get a list of all the Domain Controllers in the domain&amp;#160;and then authenticates against all of them.&amp;#160;In a typical Enterprise deployment, it would be common to have a Domain Controller at each&amp;hellip;&lt;div class=&quot;item_footer&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.priveonlabs.com/sec_blog.php?title=acs-v5-should-be-able-to-query-only-desired-domain-controllers-active-directory-dns-workaround&amp;amp;more=1&amp;amp;c=1&amp;amp;tb=1&amp;amp;pb=1&quot;&gt;Original post&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Background:Currently in ACS 5.x, ACS queries DNS in order to get a list of all the Domain Controllers in the domain&#160;and then authenticates against all of them.&#160;In a typical Enterprise deployment, it would be common to have a Domain Controller at each&hellip;<div class="item_footer"><p><small><a href="http://blog.priveonlabs.com/sec_blog.php?title=acs-v5-should-be-able-to-query-only-desired-domain-controllers-active-directory-dns-workaround&amp;more=1&amp;c=1&amp;tb=1&amp;pb=1">Original post</a>.</small></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
								<comments>http://blog.priveonlabs.com/sec_blog.php?title=acs-v5-should-be-able-to-query-only-desired-domain-controllers-active-directory-dns-workaround&amp;more=1&amp;c=1&amp;tb=1&amp;pb=1#comments</comments>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.priveonlabs.com/sec_blog.php?tempskin=_rss2&#38;disp=comments&#38;p=260</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>Changing Tivoli Endpoint Manager service startup from Automatic (Delayed Start) to Automatic</title>
			<link>http://blog.priveonlabs.com/sec_blog.php?title=changing-tem-service-startup-from-automatic-delayed-start-to-automatic&amp;more=1&amp;c=1&amp;tb=1&amp;pb=1</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 15:59:41 +0000</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Fred Parks</dc:creator>
			<category domain="main">Tivoli Endpoint Manager/BigFix</category>
<category domain="alt">Cisco NAC</category>			<guid isPermaLink="false">259@http://blog.priveonlabs.com/</guid>
						<description>Background While working in an environment with TEM (Tivoli Endpoint Manager - formerly BigFix) and Cisco's NAC (Network Admission Control) technology, I ran into an issue with Windows 7 machines not being allowed to pass through NAC after a TEM client&amp;hellip;&lt;div class=&quot;item_footer&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.priveonlabs.com/sec_blog.php?title=changing-tem-service-startup-from-automatic-delayed-start-to-automatic&amp;amp;more=1&amp;amp;c=1&amp;amp;tb=1&amp;amp;pb=1&quot;&gt;Original post&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Background While working in an environment with TEM (Tivoli Endpoint Manager - formerly BigFix) and Cisco's NAC (Network Admission Control) technology, I ran into an issue with Windows 7 machines not being allowed to pass through NAC after a TEM client&hellip;<div class="item_footer"><p><small><a href="http://blog.priveonlabs.com/sec_blog.php?title=changing-tem-service-startup-from-automatic-delayed-start-to-automatic&amp;more=1&amp;c=1&amp;tb=1&amp;pb=1">Original post</a>.</small></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
								<comments>http://blog.priveonlabs.com/sec_blog.php?title=changing-tem-service-startup-from-automatic-delayed-start-to-automatic&amp;more=1&amp;c=1&amp;tb=1&amp;pb=1#comments</comments>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.priveonlabs.com/sec_blog.php?tempskin=_rss2&#38;disp=comments&#38;p=259</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>Security Patch Breaks Printing in Outlook 2007 - Recalled by Microsoft</title>
			<link>http://blog.priveonlabs.com/sec_blog.php?title=security-patch-breaks-printing-in-outlook-2007-recalled-by-microsoft&amp;more=1&amp;c=1&amp;tb=1&amp;pb=1</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 13:52:36 +0000</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Fred Parks</dc:creator>
			<category domain="alt">Security Advisories</category>
<category domain="main">General Security</category>			<guid isPermaLink="false">258@http://blog.priveonlabs.com/</guid>
						<description>Anybody who installed Kb2509470 last week and happened to have Outlook 2007 may have run into a rather bizarre issue trying to print from Outlook. When attempting to print or generate a print preview from within Outlook, the user would get the error mess&amp;hellip;&lt;div class=&quot;item_footer&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.priveonlabs.com/sec_blog.php?title=security-patch-breaks-printing-in-outlook-2007-recalled-by-microsoft&amp;amp;more=1&amp;amp;c=1&amp;amp;tb=1&amp;amp;pb=1&quot;&gt;Original post&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Anybody who installed Kb2509470 last week and happened to have Outlook 2007 may have run into a rather bizarre issue trying to print from Outlook. When attempting to print or generate a print preview from within Outlook, the user would get the error mess&hellip;<div class="item_footer"><p><small><a href="http://blog.priveonlabs.com/sec_blog.php?title=security-patch-breaks-printing-in-outlook-2007-recalled-by-microsoft&amp;more=1&amp;c=1&amp;tb=1&amp;pb=1">Original post</a>.</small></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
								<comments>http://blog.priveonlabs.com/sec_blog.php?title=security-patch-breaks-printing-in-outlook-2007-recalled-by-microsoft&amp;more=1&amp;c=1&amp;tb=1&amp;pb=1#comments</comments>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.priveonlabs.com/sec_blog.php?tempskin=_rss2&#38;disp=comments&#38;p=258</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>User account not shown in Active Directory unless Advanced Mode enabled - Cisco Unity is the Culprit</title>
			<link>http://blog.priveonlabs.com/sec_blog.php?title=user-account-not-shown-in-active-directory-unless-advanced-mode-enabled-cisco-unity-is-the-culprit&amp;more=1&amp;c=1&amp;tb=1&amp;pb=1</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 12:56:31 +0000</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Fred Parks</dc:creator>
			<category domain="alt">General Security</category>
<category domain="main">Systems Security Management</category>			<guid isPermaLink="false">256@http://blog.priveonlabs.com/</guid>
						<description>I recently ran into a situation where certain users in Active Directory were just not showing up for some administrators while other admins could see them just fine. Upon further investigation it became evident that if the Advanced Mode of Active Directo&amp;hellip;&lt;div class=&quot;item_footer&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.priveonlabs.com/sec_blog.php?title=user-account-not-shown-in-active-directory-unless-advanced-mode-enabled-cisco-unity-is-the-culprit&amp;amp;more=1&amp;amp;c=1&amp;amp;tb=1&amp;amp;pb=1&quot;&gt;Original post&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I recently ran into a situation where certain users in Active Directory were just not showing up for some administrators while other admins could see them just fine. Upon further investigation it became evident that if the Advanced Mode of Active Directo&hellip;<div class="item_footer"><p><small><a href="http://blog.priveonlabs.com/sec_blog.php?title=user-account-not-shown-in-active-directory-unless-advanced-mode-enabled-cisco-unity-is-the-culprit&amp;more=1&amp;c=1&amp;tb=1&amp;pb=1">Original post</a>.</small></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
								<comments>http://blog.priveonlabs.com/sec_blog.php?title=user-account-not-shown-in-active-directory-unless-advanced-mode-enabled-cisco-unity-is-the-culprit&amp;more=1&amp;c=1&amp;tb=1&amp;pb=1#comments</comments>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.priveonlabs.com/sec_blog.php?tempskin=_rss2&#38;disp=comments&#38;p=256</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
			</channel>
</rss>
